Properties (16)
Id 38f96298-3f91-4107-9429-296441529c18
Year 2026
Cssclasses
  • purpleRed
Aliases
  • (Chalotra et al., 2026)
Import Date 06-14-2026
Template Version Notes •corrected error in rendering the linked PDF in metadata section • added the tag “noted” to the definition of comments to ignore ( like with the “in another note” tag. this is so that when making notes on chapters of a textbook, i can still export things for manual addition to the obsidian note without having to keep track of what has already been added ). Also moved the version notes to the yaml section • this version added the bookmarks section to auto collect all bookmarks. it also dropped the template auto fill of the initial source field because we never got it working and just overwrote it manually anyway. this version also added logic to handle “in another note” tag. annotations marked with this are completely ignored. used when i have information covered in a bigger note, but still want to highlight that part in text for visual clarity (so as to avoid duplicates of the same information) • running the import more then once will overwrite the file, so do not import again if you have made changes in obsidian that are not in the zotero article.
Dv Initial Source Misophonia MOC
Dv Status #status/Bare-bones-review
Dv Limitations • Results should be interpreted within the context of the study's sample size and design (author-stated qualifier; site specificity not identified as a named limitation). • Age heterogeneity may contribute to variability in symptom reporting. • Psychometric evaluation could be further strengthened; noted as requiring follow-up in future studies.
Dv Future Directions • Larger, more diverse populations recommended to examine demographic and clinical correlates. • Further investigation into multifactorial contributors: environmental exposure, personality, prior experiences. • Further investigation of the potential gender-related predisposition to misophonia, including differences in emotional and behavioral responses to triggers.
Dv Relevance • demonstrates the clinical utility of a Marathi (Indian language) translated version of the A-MISO-S, finding it satisfactory
Zotero Note Link Generated true
Checked For Zettle Notes true
Notes Audited 2026-06-14T21:38:00
Audit Notes audited as review was done

•

Prevalence of misophonia in a tertiary healthcare hospital in Mumbai with Marathi translated Amsterdam misophonia scale A-MISO-S

Status:: #status/Bare-bones-review


Metadata


Abstract

Background/Purpose Background-
• Misophonia defined by intense aversive emotional/physiological response to specific auditory triggers; autonomic and limbic hyperactivation.
• Triggers most commonly human-generated sounds (lip-smacking, whistling, voice tones); person-specific; self-generated sounds typically do not trigger response.
• Visual triggers (leg-swinging, scratching, eating) reported in approximately 45% of individuals.
• Behavioral coping includes earplugs, increasing ambient noise, verbal confrontation.
• Physical concomitants documented: tics, severe chest pain, muscle spasms, urges to harm others, urinary urgency, sexual arousal, gastrointestinal discomfort.
• Frequently comorbid: tinnitus, OCD personality disorder, Tourette syndrome, schizotypal PD, ADHD, mood and panic disorders, trichotillomania.
• Prevalence varies widely across populations: UK 49.1%, Germany 33.3%, Delhi India 17.63%, Mysuru India 28.28%, Turkey 12.8%.
• No misophonia questionnaire has been translated or validated in any Indian language; significant barrier to clinical assessment and research in non-English-speaking populations.
• A-MISO-S selected for translation based on widespread usage, strong empirical foundation, brevity, and ease of administration.

Purpose-
• Translate and validate the A-MISO-S into Marathi to enable clinical diagnosis and research in Marathi-speaking populations.
• Assess prevalence and demographic correlates of misophonia in a Mumbai hospital population.
• Contribute to cross-cultural adaptation of psychological assessment tools for the Indian context.
Participants/samples • N = 227; 96 males, 131 females; mean age 34.29 years; age range 18–77.
• Divided into three age groups: 18–40, 41–60, >60 years.
• Non-parametric snowball sampling; recruited from tertiary healthcare teaching hospital students, relatives, and friends.
• Excluded: self-reported psychiatric illness; current medication use; risk of severe emotional distress from questionnaire content.
• All participants reported normal hearing; no hearing loss, sensitivity to loud sounds, or tinnitus.
Measures • A-MISO-S: 6 clinician-rated items (0–4 each); total 0–24; severity bands: subclinical (0–4), mild (5–9), moderate (10–14), severe (15–19), extreme (20–24).
• Data collected via face-to-face structured interview administered by audiologist.
Procedures • Translation phase followed AAOS guidelines.
• Forward translation: independently performed by two native Marathi speakers fluent in English; synthesized by a translator with technical and linguistic background.
• Backward translation: performed by two speech and hearing sciences professionals with high proficiency in both languages.
• Face validity review: panel of five experienced audiologists (minimum five years clinical experience); revisions incorporated.
• Formal permission obtained from original A-MISO-S authors prior to translation.
• Validation phase: structured face-to-face interviews with 227 participants.
• Test-retest: 30 randomly selected participants re-administered the questionnaire after two weeks.
• Concurrent validity: 30 bilingual participants completed the English version first; Marathi version administered after two weeks.
• EFA conducted using Promax rotation.
• Chi-square tests used to examine associations between misophonia severity and gender, age, and education.
• Kruskal-Wallis test used for age group comparisons.
Results Psychometric properties

• Internal consistency of the translated scale was good (Cronbach's alpha).
• Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC).
• EFA yielded a single-factor solution; all items loaded strongly; factor explained a majority of total variance.
• Cross-language equivalence between English and Marathi versions was strong (Pearson r).

Prevalence and severity

• Majority of participants scored in the subclinical range; approximately one-quarter mild; smaller proportions moderate and severe; none extreme.
• Clinically significant misophonia (moderate or higher) present in approximately 11% of the sample.

Demographic correlates

• Females significantly more likely to exhibit misophonia than males.
• No significant association between age and misophonia occurrence or severity across the three age groups.
Discussion/Limits Conclusion-

• The Marathi A-MISO-S demonstrates adequate internal consistency and psychometric structure for clinical use in diagnosing misophonia.
• Prevalence of clinically significant misophonia was 11%, which the authors describe as closely aligning with Delhi findings and consistent with global estimates (cited range: 12.8%–49.1%)
• Subtle female predominance in mild category echoes prior studies; a potential gender-related predisposition is suggested, with females possibly experiencing and expressing more pronounced irritation or disgust in response to triggers.
• No participants reported prior contact with mental health services; lower service utilization may reflect limited awareness and stigma associated with seeking mental health care in India.
• Absence of age-related differences suggests misophonia affects individuals across a wide age range without a clear developmental pattern; linked to atypical auditory-emotional processing that may be stable across the lifespan.
• Environmental exposure, personality traits, and prior experiences may play a more prominent role in onset and severity than chronological age.
• Early identification and intervention are critical given documented negative effects on emotional, social, and physical well-being.
Limitations:: • Results should be interpreted within the context of the study's sample size and design (author-stated qualifier; site specificity not identified as a named limitation).
• Age heterogeneity may contribute to variability in symptom reporting.
• Psychometric evaluation could be further strengthened; noted as requiring follow-up in future studies.
Future Directions:: • Larger, more diverse populations recommended to examine demographic and clinical correlates.
• Further investigation into multifactorial contributors: environmental exposure, personality, prior experiences.
• Further investigation of the potential gender-related predisposition to misophonia, including differences in emotional and behavioral responses to triggers.
Relevance:: • demonstrates the clinical utility of a Marathi (Indian language) translated version of the A-MISO-S, finding it satisfactory

Notes

key terms and concepts

A-MISO-S (Amsterdam Misophonia Scale–Revised) – six clinician-rated items each scored 0–4; cumulative 0–24; categories: subclinical, mild, moderate, severe, extreme.

Misophonia – intense aversive emotional and physiological response to specific auditory stimuli, typically involving hyperactivation of the autonomic and limbic systems.

Cross-cultural adaptation – standardized translation and validation protocol (AAOS guidelines) enabling use of a psychometric tool in a new language and cultural context.

Internal consistency – degree to which scale items measure the same construct; assessed via Cronbach's alpha.

Test-retest reliability – temporal stability of scores across two administrations; assessed via intraclass correlation coefficient.

my engagement notes

my questions

my comments

Bookmarks

reading notes

contextual statement

In a 2026 study, Chalotra attempted to translate and validate the A-MISO-S into Marathi and assess misophonia prevalence by conducting face-to-face structured interviews with 227 adults (96M/131F, ages 18–77) recruited through snowball sampling at a tertiary hospital in Mumbai, India.

summary statement

Zettelkasten

Validation of a Marathi translated A-MISO-S scale and evidence of significance Indian prevalence