Properties (14)
- purpleRed
- The unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders for misophonia
- (McMahon et al., 2024)
The unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders for misophonia: a pilot trial exploring acceptability and efficacy
Status:: #status/Bare-bones-review
Metadata
- Item Type: #journalArticle
- Authors:: Kibby McMahon, Clair Cassiello-Robbins, Anna Greenleaf, Rachel Guetta, Emily Frazer-Abel, Lisalynn Kelley, M. Zachary Rosenthal,
- Date:
- Date Added: 1708318557000
- URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1294571/full
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1294571
- Cite Key: mcmahonUnifiedProtocolTransdiagnostic2024
- Topics: [object Object],[object Object]
- Tags:: #Misophonia, #Bare-bones-review-🦴, #clinical, #CBT, #Unified-protocol-(UP), #single-case-design, #behavioral-ontervention, #sound-intolerance,
- PDF Attachments
Abstract
| Background/Purpose | Background- • Misophonia is a relatively new clinical concept marked by functional impairment due to intense reactions to everyday sounds. • Prior studies indicate co-occurrence with anxiety, mood, and other emotional disorders, supporting a transdiagnostic conceptualization. • Few evidence-based treatments exist, and only one RCT has tested CBT for misophonia specifically. Purpose- • Evaluate the acceptability and preliminary efficacy of the UP for treating adult misophonia symptoms. • Study 1 tested the standard UP to gather patient feedback. • Study 2 applied a revised UP based on Study 1 feedback to assess improved outcomes. |
| Participants/samples | • Study 1: 8 participants (7 women, 1 man; mean age = 35), all white. • Study 2: 10 participants (8 women, 2 men; mean age = 33.5), racially diverse. • Inclusion: Age 18–65, misophonia symptom criteria met via MQ. • Exclusion: Psychosis, mania, anorexia, non-English proficiency. |
| Measures | • Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5) and SCID-5-PD for diagnostics. • Misophonia Questionnaire (MQ): Symptoms, emotions/behaviors, and severity. • OASIS/ODSIS/OAnSIS: Anxiety, depression, anger severity/impairment. • DMQ: Misophonia symptom severity, impairment, and beliefs. • Acceptability questionnaires: Self-report and qualitative feedback. |
| Procedures | • Randomized 2- or 4-week baseline phase, followed by 16 weekly UP sessions and 4-week follow-up. • Study 1 used standard UP; Study 2 used revised UP with misophonia-specific adaptations (e.g., tailored psychoeducation, case examples, mindfulness scripts). • Adaptations helped personalize skills (e.g., mindfulness, cognitive flexibility, exposure) to misophonia triggers. • Weekly outcome tracking; compensation provided for assessment completion. • Initial diagnostic and baseline assessment. • Randomized to: • 2-week baseline OR 4-week baseline. • 16 sessions of UP. • 4-week follow-up. • Weekly symptom monitoring. • DMQ administered at intake, pre-treatment, week 8, post-treatment, follow-up. Study 1 • Standard UP protocol. Study 2 • UP with standardized misophonia-specific examples and psychoeducation. • Core structure maintained. |
| Results | Study 1: • Moderate to high acceptability and satisfaction. • Significant reductions in emotional/behavioral misophonia responses, anxiety, and anger. • Small improvements in misophonia symptoms and severity; no effect on depression. • DMQ: Medium improvement in beliefs; small in symptoms and impairment. Study 2: • High acceptability, satisfaction, and perceived helpfulness. • Large effects on emotional/behavioral responses, misophonia severity, and anxiety. • Medium effects on misophonia symptoms and anger; small effects on depression. • Improvements maintained or increased during follow-up. |
| Discussion/Limits | Conclusion- • The UP is a feasible, acceptable, and promising intervention for misophonia. • Particularly effective in reducing emotional reactivity and avoidance behaviors. |
| Limitations:: | • Small sample sizes. • SCED limits generalizability. • Missing data at some timepoints. |
| Future Directions:: | • Larger controlled trials. • Examine long-term maintenance. • Further personalize treatment delivery (e.g., hybrid models). |
| Relevance:: | • describes validation of a treatment approach to misophonia which shows some promise , the Unified protocol (UP), basically a CBT approach that focuses on mechanisms shared across disorders rather then strictly focused on any single disorder ) • a good source for background info on a number of different clinical scales/structured interviews • a good source to revisit for info on the clinical side of things • showed actual good results from exposure approaches, which contradicts what Brout and others have said about Misophonia |
Notes
key terms and concepts
-
Misophonia - A disorder characterized by intense emotional and behavioral responses to specific trigger sounds, often related to oral or facial sounds.
-
Unified Protocol (UP) - A transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy designed to treat emotional disorders by targeting shared mechanisms such as emotional intolerance and avoidance behaviors.
-
Single-case experimental design (SCED) - A research design where each participant serves as their own control, often used to test treatment efficacy with strong internal validity.
-
Emotion exposure - A CBT technique used in the UP to gradually confront and tolerate distressing emotional triggers.
-
Interoceptive exposure - A component of UP that involves exposing individuals to physical sensations associated with distress to increase tolerance.
-
DMQ (Duke Misophonia Questionnaire) - A validated self-report instrument measuring misophonia symptoms, impairment, and beliefs.
my engagement notes
my questions
my comments
Bookmarks
- bookmark for talking about why exposure worked here (page 15)
reading notes
zettlekasten
McMahon 2024 showing an instance of exposure helping treat Misophonia
McMahon 2024 showing successful misophonia treatment via a unified protocol